Fight Aging! Newsletter, July 31st 2017

Fight Aging! provides a weekly digest of news and commentary for thousands of subscribers interested in the latest longevity science: progress towards the medical control of aging in order to prevent age-related frailty, suffering, and disease, as well as improvements in the present understanding of what works and what doesn’t work when it comes to extending healthy life. Expect to see summaries of recent advances in medical research, news from the scientific community, advocacy and fundraising initiatives to help speed work on the repair and reversal of aging, links to online resources, and much more.

This content is published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. You are encouraged to republish and rewrite it in any way you see fit, the only requirements being that you provide attribution and a link to Fight Aging!

To subscribe or unsubscribe please visit:


  • A Civilization Intent on Eating Itself into an Early Grave
  • The Fall into Nihilism
  • Loss of Neural Stem Cells in the Hypothalamus Influences the Pace of Aging
  • Advocacy for Rejuvenation Research is as Much a Process of Documentation as it is a Process of Persuasion
  • Evidence Suggests that, at Least in Earlier Stages, Alzheimer’s Disease Blocks Rather than Destroys Memories
  • Arguments for the Development of Rejuvenation Therapies
  • A View of the Immunology of Age-Related Disease
  • Growth Requires Funded Advocacy for Longevity Science
  • The Geroscience Perspective
  • Seeding Regrowth of Liver Tissue
  • Neuroinflammation in Age-Related Retinal Degeneration
  • Regeneration of Retinal Cells in Adult Mice
  • More Theorizing on the Role of Pathogens in Alzheimer’s Disease
  • Changes in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Activity with Aging
  • An Introduction to Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Regenerative Research

A Civilization Intent on Eating Itself into an Early Grave

If the successes in technological development achieved over the past few hundred years is teaching us anything, perhaps it should be that individual members of a species that evolved in an environment of pervasive scarcity and intermittent famine are not well equipped for an environment of consistent plenty. Our biochemistry and our instincts lead us astray: eat too many calories and life expectancy and long-term health will suffer for it. This is not new. We are no different from our ancestors in this aspect of the human condition. The change lies in the fact that we now live in an age so wealthy and capable that consistent overeating is affordable for a majority of the global population. Since people, on average, tend to follow their incentives in the short term rather than in the long term, the result is a very rapid growth in lifestyle diseases.

Visceral fat tissue doesn’t care that you think it is hard to avoid. Maybe it is hard. But that doesn’t change the choice, or the fact that it is a choice: choose to eat less, or choose to suffer the consequences resulting from the visceral fat tissue that you gain. That means greater lifetime medical expenditures, more years of chronic age-related disease, more disability, and a younger death than those who did managed to stay slim. Visceral fat tissue interacts with the immune system to generate chronic inflammation, and may increase the burden of senescent cells that also contribute to inflammation. Inflammation accelerates the development and progression all of the common age-related diseases, particularly cardiovascular disease. Issues in the vascular system in turn accelerate the decline into dementia. There is no such thing as being both healthy and overweight. Excess visceral fat tissue at any age is a bad thing.

What lies ahead in the matter of cheap calories and consequent declines in personal health? Most likely a future of continued issues and an increasingly overweight population, at least until someone comes up with a low-cost technological fix that work well enough to gain widespread adoption. Zero calorie food bases, maybe, or an implementation for human medicine of one of the various ways in which mice can be engineered to resist fat deposition. For the individual, it will for a while yet remain a matter of willpower and choice. It is risky to let things go in the hope that medical science will rescue you from the consequences of poor choices. The future of rejuvenation therapies will not happen as rapidly as we’d like: it will be piecemeal, and roll out incrementally over decades. That is plenty of time for even the younger members of the audience to dig a deep hole of ill health through becoming overweight and sedentary.

Study finds 90 percent of American men overfat

Does your waist measure more than half your height? In developed countries up to 90 percent of adult males and 50 percent of children may suffer from this condition. In the top overfat countries, 80 percent of women fall into this category. The term overfat refers to the presence of excess body fat that can impair health, and may include even normal-weight non-obese individuals. Excess body fat, especially abdominal fat, is associated with increased risk of chronic diseases, increased morbidity and mortality, and reduced quality of life. Researchers reported earlier this year that up to 76 percent of the world’s population may be overfat. Now these same researchers have focused their efforts on data from 30 of the top developed countries, with even more alarming findings.

The relationship between the overfat condition and poor health is a spectrum or progression in which the vicious cycle of excess body fat, insulin resistance and chronic inflammation lie at one end, causing abnormal blood fats (cholesterol and triglycerides) and glucose, and elevated blood pressure, which then produces a variety of common diseases at the other end. Being overfat is linked to hypertension, dyslipidemia, coronary heart disease, stroke, cancer, type 2 diabetes, gallbladder disease, osteoarthritis and gout, pulmonary diseases, sleep apnea and others. Traditional means of assessment, such as stepping on a scale or calculating Body Mass Index (BMI), are ineffective at determining whether someone is overfat. Instead, researchers recommend taking a measure of the waistline (at the level of the belly button) and comparing it to height.

Overfat Adults and Children in Developed Countries: The Public Health Importance of Identifying Excess Body Fat

It was recently estimated that between 62% and 76% of the world’s population have reached body fat levels that can impair health. This condition, which can now be labeled a pandemic, was described by the catch-all term overfat. It is well-recognized that the overweight and obese conditions represent a continuing threat to world health, replacing more traditional problems of undernutrition and infectious diseases. Indeed, being overfat shares direct links to insulin resistance and chronic inflammation, and to hypertension, dyslipidemia, coronary heart disease, stroke, cancer, Type 2 diabetes, gallbladder disease, osteoarthritis and gout, pulmonary diseases, sleep apnea, and others. Global rates of these conditions in adults and children (including adolescents) have risen significantly over the past ~40 years, paralleling significant increases in the numbers classified as being overweight and obese, and considerably affecting people of all ages and incomes in both developed and developing countries.

While the prevalence of being overweight and obese is well known, many normal-weight and non-obese individuals exhibit excess levels of body fat that can adversely affect their health. Indeed, reliance of body mass index (BMI) for determination of being overweight and obese may misclassify up to 50% or more of patients with excess body fat who may have increased health risks. The notion of a metabolically obese normal weight (MONW) individual is based on the finding that obesity-associated disorders such as high circulating insulin levels in people with cardiovascular disease or Type 2 diabetes can occur in those with normal BMI. Many at-risk individuals have been identified in a BMI range of 23-25 or lower. Overfat individuals who are not overweight and obese include MONW individuals, those with sarcopenic obesity, and many who have increased abdominal fat stores. Abdominal and visceral fat accumulation, regardless of weight status, has been found to increase risk of cardiovascular and metabolic (cardiometabolic) disease to the greatest degree.

Based on BMI evaluations, there appears to be a leveling off of the trend in rising obesity rates in some developed nations. However, the incidence of central adiposity – the excess accumulation of visceral fat in the abdominal region, sometimes called abdominal obesity – is increasing. This form of overfat is concerning because the potential health risks of central adiposity are more pronounced than those for increased subcutaneous fat in other regions of the body. The continued increase in abdominal obesity includes those who are normal weight and non-obese, with US population averages of 54.2%, and an increased prevalence in women (up to 68.3%). The estimate of overfat in the world’s 30 top developed nations is substantially higher than the prevalence of overweight and obese adults and children worldwide. Regardless of BMI values, overfat individuals have excess body fat, a high degree of cardiometabolic dysregulation that can promote disease risk factors and chronic disease, increased morbidity and mortality, reduced quality of life, and pose a rising economic burden.

The economic fallout from the overfat pandemic has raised a serious global challenge. In 2011, the WHO estimated that the economic burden of preventable, non-communicable disease (in particular cardiovascular disease, cancer, and diabetes) is expected to create a cumulative output loss of 47 trillion over the next two decades. In 2010, this represented 75% of global GDP (63 trillion) – enough capital to lift the 2.5 billion people currently below the poverty line, out of poverty for more than half a century. While it is difficult to determine the absolute burden of the overfat pandemic, it is clearly a strong causal factor in the development of a significant portion of chronic disease and reduced quality of life.

The Fall into Nihilism

It starts with the death of companion animals. Not when you are young and comparatively resilient, but later in adult life when you are personally responsible for all of the decisions and costs, the management of a slow and painful decline. The futile delaying actions, the ugly realizations, the fading away, the lost capacity, the indignities and the pain, and all in an individual fully capable of feeling, but who lacks the ability to comprehend what is happening, or to help resist it. One slowly realizes that this is just a practice run for what will happen to everyone you know, later, and then to you. Ultimately it comes to euthanasia, and one sits there looking down at an animal who is a shadow of his or her previous self, second guessing oneself on degree of suffering, degree of spark and verve remaining. It is rarely a clear-cut choice, as in most companion animals the body fails before the mind. When it is clear, and your companion is dying in front of you, you will rush, and later chew it over for a long time afterwards; did you wait too long, could you have done better?

At some point you will ask yourself: why am I trying to maximize this life span? Why am I playing at balancing capacity against suffering? Why have I not just drawn an end to it? Why does it matter if a dog, a cat, another animal exists until tomorrow? Next year the animal will be gone without trace. In ten thousand years, it is most likely that you will be gone without trace. In a billion years, nothing recognizable will remain of the present state of humanity, regardless of whether there is continuation of intelligence or not. The great span of time before and after cares nothing for a dying companion animal. There is no meaning beyond whatever meaning you give to any of this, and there is a very thin line between that and the belief that there is no meaning at all, the belief that there is no point. If the animal you lived with will be gone, what was the point of it all? If you will be gone, why are you so fixated on being alive now, or tomorrow, or some arbitrary length of time from now?

It starts with companion animals, and it gnaws at you. The first of the cats and dogs you live with as the responsible party, the thinking party, the one motivated to find some meaning in it all, arrive and age to death between your twenties and your forties. That is traumatic at the end, but you find it was only practice, because by the end of that span of time, the first of the people closest to you start to die, in accidents and in the earlier manifestations of age-related disease. The death by aging of companion animals teaches you grief and the search for rationales – meaningless or otherwise – and you will go on to apply those lessons. To your parents, to mentors, to all of those a generation older who suddenly crumple with age, withering into a hospital or last years in a nursing facility. You are drawn into the sorry details of the pain and the futile attempts to hold on for the ones closest to you, a responsible party again. You are left thinking: why all this suffering? Why do we do this? What does it matter that we are alive? The span of a billion years ahead looms large, made stark and empty by the absence of those dying now, no matter how bustling it might in fact prove to be.

Grief and exposure to the slow collapse of aging in others: these are toxins. These are forms of damage. They eat at you. They diminish you, diminish your willingness to engage, to be alive, to go on. I think that this burden, as much as the physical degeneration of age, is why near all people are accepting of an end. The tiredness is in the mind, the weight of unwanted experiences of death by aging and what those experiences have come to mean to the individual. Human nature just doesn’t work well under this load. It becomes easy to flip the switch in your view of the world: on the one side there is earnest work to end future suffering by building incrementally better medical technology, while on the other side lies some form of agreement with those who say that sadness and suffering can be cured by ending all life upon this world. Oh, you might recoil from it put so bluntly, but if you accept that existence doesn’t matter, then the gentle, kind, persuasive ending of all entities who suffer or might suffer lies at the logical end of that road. It is just a matter of how far along you are today in your considerations of euthanasia and pain. This is the fall into nihilism, driven by the urge to flee from suffering, and the conviction that your own assemblies of meaning are weak and empty in the face of the grief that is past, and the grief that you know lies ahead.

Not all of the costs of the present human condition are visible as lines upon the face.

Loss of Neural Stem Cells in the Hypothalamus Influences the Pace of Aging

A few years back, researchers found that manipulating levels of NF-κB in the hypothalamus influenced the pace of aging in mice. That work was several steps removed from any idea as to what exactly was going on under the hood; changing the amount of a specific protein in circulation can have any number of effects, both direct and subtle. NF-κB is already an area of interest in the study of aging and metabolism, and so there are many mechanisms to speculate on in this context. There was indeed speculation at the time. Other indirect evidence suggests that the quality of cellular function in the hypothalamus is connected to the pace of aging, such as results arising from investigations of autophagy and its relevance in this part of the brain. Other researchers have made some inroads into mapping possible ways in which the hypothalamus might influence the operation of metabolism throughout the body in order to modestly speed or slow aging. It is well known that the hypothalamus regulates all sorts of aspects of metabolism, but the open question is which of these relationships are relevant to the matter at hand.

The team that investigated NF-κB in the hypothalamus has since been hard at work, seeking a better understanding as to why this part of the brain is important in the way in which metabolic processes determine individual variations in aging and longevity. In a recently published paper, the team now points to one particular small population of stem cells in the hypothalamus that diminishes with age; losing these cells more rapidly appears to speed processes of aging throughout the body. The researchers believe that signals generated by these cells are the mechanism of action, and a closer investigation of these signals is the next step in this line of research. It has to be said that this sounds quite similar to the situation for Parkinson’s disease, at least at the high level, in which one small but critical population of cells in the brain is diminished at a different pace in different individuals, and where autophagy – and disruption of autophagy in aging – might be important in determining the rate of loss. It also clearly parallels what is known of the age-related decline of stem cell populations in all tissues. We become damaged, and stem cell loss and inactivity is a downstream consequence of that damage.

Either way, this might make an interesting target for cell therapy: certainly, replacement of stem cell populations is on the rejuvenation research checklist. Whether it is a priority in this case rather depends on the size of the effect, however, which in this study looks like a ~10% gain in life expectancy resulting from a single cell therapy treatment carried out in middle-aged mice. Unfortunately, significant changes in longevity in mice on the basis of altered metabolism so far do not translate to significant changes in longevity in humans, at least in the few areas where the data exists for comparison. The life spans of short-lived mammals are far more plastic in response to circumstances and interventions than those of long-lived mammals. In the case of stem cell replacement as a way to reverse declines, however, it is hard to say how the comparisons will turn out – the data just isn’t there yet. It is the fond hope of many in our community that approaches based on repairing loss and damage, very different from approaches based on altering metabolism to modestly slow damage accumulation or resist the consequences of damage, will turn out to have similarly scaled effects on life span in mice and humans. Maybe so, maybe not. As I said, the data isn’t there. In order to find out, rejuvenation therapies based on repair must be rigorously tested in humans, and that hasn’t yet happened in any useful way, even in the stem cell field.

Brain Cells Found to Control Aging

The hypothalamus was known to regulate important processes including growth, development, reproduction and metabolism. In a 2013 paper, researchers made the surprising finding that the hypothalamus also regulates aging throughout the body. Now, the scientists have pinpointed the cells in the hypothalamus that control aging: a tiny population of adult neural stem cells, which were known to be responsible for forming new brain neurons. “Our research shows that the number of hypothalamic neural stem cells naturally declines over the life of the animal, and this decline accelerates aging. But we also found that the effects of this loss are not irreversible. By replenishing these stem cells or the molecules they produce, it’s possible to slow and even reverse various aspects of aging throughout the body.”

In studying whether stem cells in the hypothalamus held the key to aging, the researchers first looked at the fate of those cells as healthy mice got older. The number of hypothalamic stem cells began to diminish when the animals reached about 10 months, which is several months before the usual signs of aging start appearing. “By old age – about two years of age in mice – most of those cells were gone.” The researchers next wanted to learn whether this progressive loss of stem cells was actually causing aging and was not just associated with it. So they observed what happened when they selectively disrupted the hypothalamic stem cells in middle-aged mice. “This disruption greatly accelerated aging compared with control mice, and those animals with disrupted stem cells died earlier than normal.” Could adding stem cells to the hypothalamus counteract aging? To answer that question, the researchers injected hypothalamic stem cells into the brains of middle-aged mice whose stem cells had been destroyed as well as into the brains of normal old mice. In both groups of animals, the treatment slowed or reversed various measures of aging.

The researchers found that the hypothalamic stem cells appear to exert their anti-aging effects by releasing molecules called microRNAs (miRNAs). They are not involved in protein synthesis but instead play key roles in regulating gene expression. miRNAs are packaged inside tiny particles called exosomes, which hypothalamic stem cells release into the cerebrospinal fluid of mice. The researchers extracted miRNA-containing exosomes from hypothalamic stem cells and injected them into the cerebrospinal fluid of two groups of mice: middle-aged mice whose hypothalamic stem cells had been destroyed and normal middle-aged mice. This treatment significantly slowed aging in both groups of animals as measured by tissue analysis and behavioral testing.

Hypothalamic stem cells control ageing speed partly through exosomal miRNAs

Although the nervous system clearly has a role in ageing, and research has demonstrated that the hypothalamus is particularly important, the cellular mechanism responsible for ageing is still unknown. It has been shown that adult neural stem/progenitor cells (NSCs) reside in a few brain regions that mediate local ­neurogenesis and therefore several aspects of brain functioning. Studies on adult neurogenesis have focused on the hippocampus and the sub-ventricular zone of the lateral ventricle in the brain. Decreased neurogenesis in these regions often correlates with the advent of related ageing-­associated disorders. More recently, it has been shown that adult NSCs are present in the hypothalamus, in particular in the mediobasal hypothalamic region (MBH), which is crucial for the neuroendocrine regulation of the physiological homeostasis of the whole body. We have previously shown that the hypothalamus has a programmatic role in causing systemic ageing. In this context, we investigated whether these hypothalamic NSCs (htNSCs) might be mechanistically responsible for this process.

We show that loss of htNSCs is an important cause of ageing in the whole body. This understanding aligns with our previous research showing that the hypothalamus has a programmatic role in systemic ageing. The underlying basis could be related to two functions of these cells: endocrine secretion and neurogenesis. Here we report that the modulation of ageing by htNSCs was achieved in a relatively short period, which should not have a major contribution from neurogenesis, while an endocrine function of these cells provided a neurogenesis-independent mechanism. In this context, we show that the anti-ageing effect of htNSCs is partially mediated by exosomal miRNAs secreted from these cells. Therefore, besides the classical endocrine function of the hypothalamus in secreting peptidyl hormones, htNSCs have a new type of endocrine function by secreting exosomal miRNAs.

Given this finding, we still predict that neuropeptide secretion by htNSCs, although not addressed in this work, also participates in the regulation of systemic ageing. This is partly because we previously found that GnRH is involved in the hypothalamic control of ageing and we observed here that some implanted htNSCs gave rise to GnRH-expressing cells. Thus, neuropeptide-based endocrine functions of htNSCs and their differentiated offsprings can contribute to the anti-ageing effects of these cells from other perspectives. Despite these outstanding questions, the overall findings in this work support that htNSCs are essential for the control of ageing speed.

Advocacy for Rejuvenation Research is as Much a Process of Documentation as it is a Process of Persuasion

This is a lightly edited update of an older article that I think merits its own post. There are more people writing on the topic of rejuvenation research these days. The goal of treating aging as a medical condition has gained more supporters. Some of those people are forming new organizations, thinking out loud on the nature of advocacy, what works and what does not. So perhaps it is time to revisit this older opinion on advocacy as a process of structured conveyance of information, of creating documentation where documentation is presently lacking.

Let us start by paraphrasing an old joke: did you know that we all express the symptoms of a fatal, inherited degenerative condition? It is called aging. It is a dark joke, but there is truth to be found in it, as is often the case in black humor. Unfortunately, all too few people think of themselves as patients suffering aging, and fewer still would call themselves patient advocates, agitating for research to lead towards therapies and cures for aging. This is a sorry state of affairs; given that our time is limited and ticking away, the tasks upon the table should always include some consideration of aging. What can we do about it? How can we engineer a research community, funding and support to make real progress within our lifetimes? If you don’t spend at least some of your time on this issue, then you are fiddling while Rome burns. Time is the most precious thing we have, and we live on the cusp of technologies that will allow us to gain more time – but those advances in medicine won’t happen soon enough unless we work at it.

Working to create progress in longevity science doesn’t have to mean working in a laboratory. Most of the modest efforts I have made to help matters along take the form of written advocacy at Fight Aging! and elsewhere: sharing events, passing on news, putting scientific publications in context, explaining where we stand in research and development, encouraging fundraising, and so on. In effect this is a sort of loose documentation, a way to demonstrate the existence of a community of people interested in rejuvenation research, and a way to provide direction and grounding to newcomers: how to become involved, how to benefit from becoming involved, and how to help advance the science of human longevity. A body of documentation is a necessary foundation for later phases of development in longevity science, but will also help broaden the community of people who are both aware of this work and understand what it might be used to achieve.

Not everyone agrees that this is useful, however. One of the challenging attitudes I’ve encountered over the years is the idea that documentation of longevity science in this manner is largely worthless – that time and funds spent trying to make science clear to developers and laypeople should go towards other, more direct activities like further research. This sort of criticism is, I think, symptomatic of a failure to understand the necessary role of advocacy and education in the broader scope of technological progress. This article, then, is an answer of sorts: what is the role of documentation, and why is it so important that we should strive to build organizations that do this well?

The Challenge of Complex Ideas

Most important topics relating to the future of advanced technological development are very complex: the basis for rejuvenation therapies, strong artificial intelligence, molecular manufacturing, and so forth. Even the general concepts (such as “why is this important?”, “why is this plausible?”, or “why should I support it?”) are made up of many moving parts and conditional arguments that the broader public generally hasn’t thought about yet. Thus we advocates can’t just jump in and start persuading people that radical life extension is a great idea: instead, when it comes time to try to explain why this goal is important – and how best to proceed with research and development – we must first walk through a whole squadron of supporting concepts that are unfamiliar to the audience. Each must be explained, and only then can they be assembled into the final persuasive conclusion.

In the area of healthy life extension and biotechnologies to repair aging, an array of foundational ideas might include the following:

  • This is a time of radical progress in biotechnology, far more so than even just a decade ago.
  • Scientists can extend life in a score of different ways in laboratory animals.
  • But you don’t see the results of this work in the clinic because the FDA is needlessly obstructive.
  • Aging is just damage, and that damage is well enough understood for work on practical repair biotechnologies to proceed.
  • A large-scale research program could plausibly produce decades of life extension by 2040.
  • Any effective longevity therapy will give people more time of life and health to wait for even better new therapies.
  • Overpopulation is a myth, and longer lives won’t greatly increase population in any case.
  • Ethical objections to engineered longevity are all weak in comparison to the massive and ongoing harm caused by aging.

Each of these is no small thing in and of itself, and worthy of longer treatment. So presenting all of the concepts that lead up to thinking about rejuvenation biotechnologies is time-consuming, hard to do well, and requires a willing and interested audience. Unfortunately few people in the broader public are in fact willing put in the effort to follow you, me, or anyone else with a complicated idea all the way from square one to the end point. That takes time and attention, both of which are precious commodities, hard to obtain at the best of times. Thus the ideas that do gain traction in our culture are those that can be successfully communicated in a short period of time, because they build directly upon what is already known.

The Example of Hotmail

The recent past provides many good examples of ideas that could be quickly communicated to the public at large, and as a result rapidly gained interest and support. Hotmail is one such example: when the company was founded in 1996, it was the first service to offer email over the web. The founders were petrified that they would be beaten to the punch because the idea was absolutely obvious in hindsight: take email, take websites, and merge the two. Anyone in the internet-using world could easily grasp that concept, and the service took off like wildfire when it launched.

But let’s stop to think about that for a moment. Both email and the way in which most people experience the web are in and of themselves very complicated concepts. Imagine that some visionary fellow gave you the task of explaining to the public an email service used via a web site in 1970: you would be right back to having to explain many foundational, unfamiliar concepts to an audience unwilling to give you sufficient time and attention. What is a network? How do ordinary people connect to or even use a network? What is a web browser? How does an ecosystem of websites and hosting services arise? Why would I need email, or some sort of patchwork visual information service? And so forth. Nonetheless, in 1996 Hotmail was an idea that could be conveyed and understood in a single sentence. “Email via a website.” When we consider this and other similar examples, we see that there must be an ongoing process by which complex, unfamiliar, and challenging ideas become simple, familiar, and easily communicated ideas.

Layers of Knowledge, Attention, and Expertise

You might envisage the broad field of longevity science as a series of concentric circles. The innermost circle is made up of a small number of people who pay a great deal of attention to the field, and who possess the most knowledge and expertise: researchers who work on cutting edge science, for example. The outermost circle consists of a large number of people who pay just a little attention to the field, and who possess the least knowledge and expertise – such as casual advocates and interested members of the public. The progression of circles from innermost to outermost reflects an increasing number of people, but lesser expertise and attention. I’d loosely categorize the circles from inner to outer as follows:

  • Cutting edge researchers.
  • Other researchers, postgraduates, and scientists in related fields.
  • Dedicated patient advocates.
  • Medical technology developers, funding sources.
  • Physicians, clinicians and medical technicians.
  • Interested members of the public.

In this model of human endeavor, knowledge flows outward while funds and newly participating members of the community flow inward – or at least, that is the ideal. In practice, managing this flow of knowledge is a big and thorny problem: many of the most important movements in technology over the last few decades have focused on how to best move knowledge from inner circles to outer circles. Consider the open science movements, fights over closed journal business models, and the many efforts to try to adopt open source practices in the scientific community, to consider but a few examples.

Let me advance a definition for the purposes of this article: documentation is the name given to explanations and tutorials produced by the members of one circle that are intended for the next outermost circle. For example, review papers written by scientists present an overview of progress in one area of research rather than new data or results. These review papers are a form of documentation for the next outermost circle of researchers – scientists in other fields, or postgraduates, or other academics with less experience in the topic at hand.

To take another example, what I do at Fight Aging! is a form of documentation by this definition: ongoing efforts to explain the ins and outs of longevity science to people who are less familiar with the field, and who have less time to devote to understanding the work of researchers. Academic publicity services at the major universities also perform a similar task, producing explanations for the outer circles of doctors, interested members of the public, and the like.

Documentation thus moves raggedly and through many hands, as each circle learns from the inward circles and then in turn explains its knowledge, understanding, and work to the outer circles. That there are so many layers involved goes a long way towards explaining how science so often becomes garbled and misinterpreted on the way from researchers to the interested public. The process works over time, however, as the example of Hotmail well illustrates. The level of knowledge in the outer circles does increase, and the efforts of people involved in producing documentation make it easier for new ideas to gain traction.

Researchers, Like Most Communities, Document Poorly and Reluctantly

Anyone who spends time working in a technical field eventually forms a cynical attitude towards documentation: it is never what it might be, and the next innermost circle never does a good enough job of explaining themselves. This is simply the way of the world: most people in a given circle spend the majority of their time and effort in communicating with each other, not with the members of the next outermost circle. In the sciences, researchers write papers for one another as a part of the business of research, and this publishing of results is not intended to educate anyone other than peers at a similar level of expertise in the same field.

The process of producing documentation for outer circles is nonetheless very important, despite being undertaken by only a minority in any field. It is only through documentation that there can exist a roadway of information to connect researchers who produce new science with developers who build clinical applications of that science. If documentation is lacking, then so is the pace of development: developers work on what they know, what can be understood, and what can be sold to their investors. Ultimately, that knowledge must come from efforts made by researchers to explain their work.

Across the years I’ve spent following work on longevity-related research as an interested observer, I’ve seen a score of techniques demonstrated to significantly extend healthy life in mice, or reverse a narrowly specific manifestation of the damage of aging. Many of these results are languishing undeveloped, as the FDA still forbids clinical application of biotechnologies for the treatment of aging, for all that there are signs that this might eventually change. There is little writing on these research results, and no good sources other than the original papers – most of which are behind journal paywalls. Thankfully those paywalls are beginning to crumble too. Yet this change is painfully slow: what hope is there for the proper transmission of knowledge from the circle of researchers to the circle of clinical developers when the researchers have little direct incentive to explain their work, due to the FDA roadblock and consequent lack of investment, and when no other group seems to be picking up the slack? Potentially viable medical technologies are lying near fallow, buried in the output of the scientific community, and left unexplained for the rest of us.

The Solution: Produce Documentation to Take up the Slack

Addressing the challenges of documentation and transmission of knowledge is an area in where a volunteer organization can make a real difference to the future of longevity science – and for a comparatively small amount of effort and money. The flow of knowledge from the research community is vital, in order to raise the level of understanding over the longer term, but also in the shorter term to make developers aware of what exists to be developed into new and potentially promising therapies.

As described above there exists a clearly identifiable gap in this process, however: science that might lead to therapies for aging exists in many different forms, but there is little to no documentation of it. The inner circles are not explaining themselves sufficiently. Thus there is little in the way of a roadway to systematically bring this knowledge out to the circles of life science students, entrepreneurs, clinical developers, and other interested parties. Those groups, in turn, have nothing to work with when it comes to educating the medical community and public at large. So as a consequence little funding flows back into the field, and few people know what is taking place, or how promising scientific progress might be. This, in a nutshell, is the problem. The US may be closed by regulatory fiat to commercial development of therapies to directly treat aging, but much of the rest of the developed world remains open for business in this field – if the developers in those countries knew more about the work that has taken place and presently lies largely buried.

The irony of the situation is that documentation isn’t expensive in the grand scheme of things, and certainly not in comparison to earnest clinical development. It doesn’t require more than a few weeks of part-time work for a life scientist, a graphic artist, and an editor to produce a long document that explains exactly how to replicate a demonstrated research result in longevity science – a way to extend life in mice, for example. That document will explain the research in plain English, at length, and in a way clearly comprehensible to people who are not cutting edge scientists: exactly what is needed open the door to a far wider audience for that research. More rather than less of this should be the normal state of affairs, but at present it is not the case.

In conclusion, documentation is important, a critical part of advocacy and the development process at the larger scale. It isn’t just words, but rather a vital structural flow of information from one part of the larger community to another, necessary to sustain progress in any complex field. We would all do well to remember this – and to see that building this documentation is an activity in which we can all pitch in to help.

Evidence Suggests that, at Least in Earlier Stages, Alzheimer’s Disease Blocks Rather than Destroys Memories

For years now, evidence has accumulated to suggest that Alzheimer’s disease blocks memory retrieval rather than destroying memories, at least in the earlier stages prior to the onset of widespread destruction of neurons. Today’s research is more of the same. This and related results raise the hope that success in any of the mainstream efforts to treat the causes of this disease should restore much of the cognitive function lost to the condition. Of course it is worth recalling that Alzheimer’s patients rarely suffer Alzheimer’s alone: it usually arrives alongside one or more other forms of neurodegeneration, each with distinct mechanisms that cause neurons to malfunction or be destroyed. This is in part because Alzheimer’s disease is to some degree a lifestyle condition; not as greatly as is the case for type 2 diabetes, but being sedentary and overweight greatly raises the risk of both Alzheimer’s and, separately, sufficiently accelerated vascular aging to cause vascular dementia or other forms of neurodegenerative condition. The brain has sizable energy demands, and is particularly vulnerable to the slow age-related failure in delivery of oxygen and nutrients.

It is worth noting that a lot of mouse breeding goes on behind the scenes in the sort of research noted here, very reliant as it is on genetic engineering. This work involved crossing three lineages. Many of the tools to investigate biochemistry in living beings take the form of genetic machinery that can be activated to tag specific cells or visualize a specific protein interaction. Each such tool is made manifest as a lineage of genetically altered mice; the change must be created early in or prior to embryonic development, as the research community still lacks a standardized toolkit for applying genetic changes to adults. If a research group wants to use multiple tools in a single experiment, then mice of the relevant lineages must be mated to obtain a cross-bred lineage. The same is true when applying a tool to a mouse model of a specific disease. Again, more cross-breeding. This is expensive and time-consuming. It is also one of the many things that will be replaced in the near future with some form of effective gene therapy platform – probably related to CRISPR – that can be deployed in adult mice, thus reducing costs and speeding progress. This is the point of the Maximally Modifiable Mice developed by the SENS Research Foundation, a program that aims to create mice equipped with a set of genetic machinery that can accept arbitrary updates in a sort of plug-and-play fashion.

Lasers reactivate ‘lost’ memories in mice with Alzheimer’s

It has long been assumed that Alzheimer’s disease completely erases memories. The condition involves clumps of proteins known as amyloid plaques and tau tangles accumulating in the brain, where they are thought to destroy the neurons that store our memories. But experiments suggest that memories may not be wiped by Alzheimer’s disease, but instead become harder to access. What’s more, these memories can be reawakened by artificially activating the neurons they are stored in.

To examine how memory is affected by Alzheimer’s disease, the researchers developed a way of visualising individual memories in mouse brains. They genetically engineered mice with neurons that glow yellow when activated during memory storage, and red when activated during memory recall. Two sets of these mice were created – one set that was healthy, and one with a condition resembling human Alzheimer’s disease. Both sets of mice took a memory test. First, they were exposed to a lemon scent and given an electric shock. Then, a week later, they were exposed to the same lemon scent. The healthy mice immediately froze in anticipation of being shocked again. But the mice with Alzheimer’s disease froze almost half as much as the healthy mice, suggesting they did not remember the link between the smell and shock so strongly.

This behaviour matched what the team saw in the hippocampi of the mice – the brain regions that record memories. In healthy mice, the red and yellow neurons overlapped, showing that the mice were retrieving the lemon-shock memory from the same place it had been stored. But in the Alzheimer’s mice, different cells glowed red during recall, suggesting that they were calling up the wrong memories. This might help explain why people with Alzheimer’s disease commonly experience false memories.

Using a genetic engineering technique called optogenetics, the team went on to reactivate the lemon-shock memory in the Alzheimer’s mice. By shining a blue laser down a fibre optic cable into the brain, they were able to stimulate the yellow memory-storing neurons, prompting the mice to freeze when they smelled the lemon scent. This shows that “lost” memories may still exist in the brain, and can be recovered. Optogenetics is not a technique that can be used in people yet, because it isn’t yet safe or practical to tinker with our neurons or stick lasers in our brains. But in the future, targeted drugs or techniques like deep-brain stimulation may help people with Alzheimer’s access their forgotten memories. The next step will be to confirm that the same memory storage and retrieval mechanisms exist in people with Alzheimer’s disease, because mouse models do not perfectly reflect the condition in humans. In particular, the number of neurons that die in mouse models of Alzheimer’s disease is far lower than in humans.

Optogenetic stimulation of dentate gyrus engrams restores memory in Alzheimer’s disease mice

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a prevalent neurodegenerative disorder characterized by amyloid-beta (Aβ) plaques and tau neurofibrillary tangles. APPswe/PS1dE9 (APP/PS1) mice have been developed as an AD model and are characterized by plaque formation at 4-6 months of age. Here, we sought to better understand AD-related cognitive decline by characterizing various types of memory. In order to better understand how memory declines with AD, APP/PS1 mice were bred with ArcCreERT2 mice. In this line, neural ensembles activated during memory encoding can be indelibly tagged and directly compared with neural ensembles activated during memory retrieval (i.e., memory traces/engrams).

We first administered a battery of tests examining depressive- and anxiety-like behaviors, as well as spatial, social, and cognitive memory to APP/PS1 × ArcCreERT2 × channelrhodopsin (ChR2)-enhanced yellow fluorescent protein (EYFP) mice. Dentate gyrus (DG) neural ensembles were then optogenetically stimulated in these mice to improve memory impairment. AD mice had the most extensive differences in fear memory, as assessed by contextual fear conditioning (CFC), which was accompanied by impaired DG memory traces. Optogenetic stimulation of DG neural ensembles representing a CFC memory increased memory retrieval in the appropriate context in AD mice when compared with control mice. Moreover, optogenetic stimulation facilitated reactivation of the neural ensembles that were previously activated during memory encoding. These data suggest that activating previously learned DG memory traces can rescue cognitive impairments and point to DG manipulation as a potential target to treat memory loss commonly seen in AD.

Arguments for the Development of Rejuvenation Therapies

Many arguments have been deployed in support of greater investment in the development of rejuvenation therapies capable of treating aging as a medical condition, and ultimately bringing an end to age-related disease and mortality. Personally, I’m in favor of rationales based on individual freedom, as “we can try and we want to try” is entirely sufficient, and utilitarian concerns based on reducing the amount of suffering and death in the world. Since aging is by far the greatest cause of human suffering and death, and since the estimated cost of developing working rejuvenation therapies based on the SENS vision is compares very favorably what is spent every year on trying and failing to cope with the harms caused by aging, it only makes sense to forge ahead. Would that everyone saw things so clearly, but of course we don’t live in that world yet. Advocacy for rejuvenation research and medicine to control aging is still very much needed, as most people simply don’t care, and many are even opposed to this grand project when it is first presented to them.

Biogerontologist Aubrey de Grey, the father of SENS, a plan for the development of rejuvenation therapies based on repair of cell and tissue damage, always likes to answer to all objections and concerns regarding rejuvenation with two general arguments. The core of the first argument can be expressed quite succinctly: are any of the potential problems that might be caused by rejuvenation in the future worse than the actual problem of ageing we have today? By and large, the yardstick by which we measure a problem’s magnitude is typically the amount of suffering, misery, and death it inflicts on people. For example, when war breaks out we do regret the destruction of landmarks and infrastructure, but that’s hardly how we measure how bad the war was – rather, we speak of how many lives it has claimed or how many people it has maimed. Around 100,000 people die every day of ageing – that is, of the pathologies of old age and their complications. This is a huge number, and it is a whopping 2/3 of the deaths that occur every day (around 150,000). In a year, that adds up to around 36,500,000 deaths. According to the most conservative estimates, around 50,000,000 people died in World War II (1939-1945); on average, that is about 8,400,000 people a year. Thus, in a year, ageing kills about four times as many people as WWII did in the same timespan.

By this measure, the problem of ageing is really bad, killing every day more people than all the other causes of death put together, and causing enormous suffering as well. If we successfully implemented a comprehensive rejuvenation platform, the problem of ageing, and all the misery it causes, would disappear altogether. Do we think that the potential side effects of defeating ageing may be so bad that we would be better off not doing it at all? For each problem that you think the defeat of ageing might cause, you can ask yourself if it would be worse than the problem we have today – the misery, suffering, and death caused by ageing, not to mention the socio-economical problems it causes as well.

The second argument is that we should not presume to know better than the people of the future. There are many objections concerning potential future problems. However, the truth is we know very little about the future, especially compared to what will be known by the people who live in that future. It would be arrogant to assume that a problem today will necessarily be a problem in the future as well. Just imagine if our forefathers two hundred years ago had reasoned: “Vaccines could cause the population to spiral out of control! They would save a lot of lives, but those very lives would go on increasing our numbers, in a way or another, and in a couple of centuries billions of people would be walking the Earth! How could we possibly feed so many mouths? Better to forget about vaccines and let nature take its course. It’s a necessary evil.”

Today, we are in the same situation as our ancestors in the example above. If we say ‘no’ to creating rejuvenation today, we would be condemning not only ourselves, but the people of the future as well, to the diseases of ageing; worse still, we would be doing so on the questionable assumption that we know enough about the world of the future to decide rejuvenation would do it more bad than good. If we develop rejuvenation, we will give our descendants (and possibly ourselves) the option to use it; if we don’t, we will deny them this option and force them to suffer from aging. One day, our descendants may either be thankful that we gave them a choice between health and disease, or regret that their arrogant and unimaginative forefathers didn’t think the matter through before deciding on behalf of humanity of the future.

A View of the Immunology of Age-Related Disease

In this open access paper, the authors present their view of the role of the immune system in age-related disease. Chronic inflammation is the primary focus of many considerations of immune aging, but there are arguably many other areas of disarray and dysfunction in the aging immune system that are just as relevant to the progression of age-related disease. Like other researchers, the authors here divide the complexity of immune aging into two broad categories: inflammaging, changes that increase chronic inflammation and inappropriate immune activation, and immunosenescence, changes that weaken the efforts of immune cells to destroy pathogens and harmful cells, such as those that have become cancerous or senescent.

The proportion of elderly people is rising worldwide, especial in the developed countries. Aging-related changes in the immune system contribute to the increased susceptibility of the elderly to infectious diseases, cardiovascular disease and stroke caused by atherosclerosis, autoimmune disease such as rheumatoid arthritis, cancer, and degenerative diseases including Alzheimer’s disease. Further, metabolic syndrome, which is caused by obesity, occurs from middle age, and proceeds to tissue failure such as renal failure in advanced age, is tightly related to the immune system. Chronic infections such as hepatitis induce tissue damage, which arouses immune responses and wound repair responses. Chronic inflammation follows tissue fibrosis in advanced age proceeding to tissue failure such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

The most prominent cause of age-related immune dysfunction is T cell immunosenescence. There are three causes of T cell immunosenescence. One is the age-related hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) deviation from lymphoid lineage to myeloid lineage. Second is the shrinkage of thymus. Third is expansion of T cell clones to cytomegalovirus (CMV). Changes of HSCs also affect immunosenescence. HSCs deviate to myeloid lineage by aging. Both in mice and humans the myeloid-lymphoid ratio elevates by aging, which induces the decline of lymphoid cells (T and B cells) and erythrocytes, and contributes to decline of adaptive immunity. The number of aged B cells decline and affinity and diversity of antibodies are low. Ageing related myeloid deviation increases the number of myeloid cells. However, the oxidative burst and phagocytosis of both neutrophils and macrophages are decreased. The antigen presentation of aged dendritic cells and the cytolysis of natural killer cells are low.

Pro-inflammatory cytokines such as interleukin-6 (IL-6), tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α) and IL-1β are elevated in elderly people, a state that is called inflammaging, and in conjunction with obesity induce metabolic syndrome, type II diabetes, atherosclerosis, cardiac diseases. However, other reports have shown that pro-inflammatory (M1) macrophages are replaced by anti-inflammatory (M2) macrophages by aging. Here to solve this discrepancy we propose to classify age-related immune changes as follows. Age-related pathological changes are classified as firstly immune cell intrinsic changes caused by aging and secondly as the involvement of immune cells in age-related pathological changes. Increased susceptibility of the elderly to infectious diseases is mainly caused by age-related immune cell intrinsic changes, and is usually called immunosenescence. Metabolic syndrome and other related diseases, which occur at aged people, are mainly caused by immune cell attack in response to age-related tissue changes. Age-related tissue failure is then caused by repeated immune cell attack.

Growth Requires Funded Advocacy for Longevity Science

As I might have mentioned once or twice, you can only get so far powered by zealotry. All movements start with the zealots and the visionaries and the earnest volunteers, but to grow to take over the mainstream, there must be funding sufficient to employ the much larger group of advocates who take a wage and go home at the end of the day. One of the growing pains of the longevity science community lies in finding this funding. In this day and age meaningful early stage medical research is comparatively cheap, and most people choose to support research programs such as those of the SENS Research Foundation rather than expanded advocacy. At some point this community has to become larger than a few volunteer efforts and a few small non-profits: infrastructure and staff must come from somewhere for greater advocacy and fundraising efforts, for conferences and outreach, and for all the other necessary tasks. It is certainly true that bootstrapping on the advocacy side of the fence is just as tough as bootstrapping on the research side of the fence.

There is a persistent view that life extension advocacy is something that does not require any investment and can be done in your spare time. Fundraising for overheads is like an elephant in the room: it is hard not to notice it is there, but people try to avoid talking about it. Without a doubt, talking to friends about the promise of rejuvenation technologies or reposting research news on your Facebook feed is useful and it can be done for free. But what if the goal is more ambitious – to change local legislation to make it more longevity-friendly, to convert decision makers of the state grant system to allocate more money to rejuvenation research, or to reach out to wealthy individuals able to fund more studies? These activities require money.

Every member of our community hopes for rejuvenation therapies to be developed, implemented and delivered at an affordable price as soon as possible. Preferably in their and their relatives’ lifetime. And even though there is a steady progress, it would be good to see it speed up. How? Mostly by removing things that are holding us back. The list of bottlenecks include the following aspects: insufficient research funding due to rejuvenation projects being innovative and not well understood by the decisionmakers in different funding bodies; flaws within the grant system: unnecessarily detailed grant applications and reports, making the scientists spend time on them, rigid rules on how money should be disposed during the project, delays in funding delivery; young scientists turning to mainstream topics like single diseases instead of rejuvenation to avoid reputational risks and problems with funding; lack of public awareness on the promise of rejuvenation technologies and the positive aspects of their massive implementation for our society; and many more. One could call life extension advocate successful if he or she is removing or mitigating some of these bottlenecks so the overall situation in the field measurably improves.

To write one popular but accurate article about aging research progress in a specific field, the activist has to spend 2-3 hours to familiarise himself with the latest publications on the topic. Writing 2-3 pages with scientific references can also take several hours. So one article usually takes a half of the working day. If the writer is also involved in social media development (which requires posting new original materials every day) this can no longer be considered a hobby: it becomes at the least a part-time job and that should be paid. Have a look at the level of salaries of scientific writers for financial reference.

The usual places to promote rejuvenation research and corresponding policies are scientific conferences, public events and meetings of working groups discussing necessary changes in a law. In addition to the conference fee, going to a conference implies travel expenditures and booking a hotel, which can stand for from several hundred to a few thousand per person, depending on the region where the conference takes place, and its duration. Promotion of a cause on a regular basis means an organization has to be represented at 10-20 events per year and often even more. Even if half of them do not have a registration fee, it means spending around 10k on the registration and up to 20k on travel and accommodation per person per year. Costs aside, going to a conference for advocacy reasons is a significant workload. In the case of lobbying for changes in the law (which can take several years), the activist has to attend from 5 to 20 meetings of the working group per year, to ensure the proposed changes are still being considered and keep being included in the new version of the law. Each meeting can take a half of a working day and implies some follow-up analytical and networking activities. You can view estimates of salaries of professional lobbyists or government relations managers for comparison.

Life extension advocacy groups are constantly seeking grant opportunities to cover their administrative needs. But all the same reasons that impede the scientists trying to receive a grant for rejuvenation research, also impede advocacy projects in our field. Due to the novelty of the idea of aging prevention, not many grant givers are keen to provide resources for its promotion. So before you ignore the “Donate” button that you see on the site of a life extension advocacy group, and before frowning at the line with administrative costs in their report, consider this: you and other members of our community are so far the only part of population who dislikes aging strongly enough to invest in the solution. And the best time to step in is always the same: now.

The Geroscience Perspective

The authors of this article express a representative version of the geroscience perspective on aging research and its application in medicine. It is similar to that of the Longevity Dividend initiative of the past decade, which is to say that if a large amount of time and funding is invested, perhaps calorie restriction mimetic and similar marginally effective drugs can be brought to the clinic in order to modestly slow the progression of aging and add a few years of healthy life expectancy sometime prior to 2030. I believe I’m not the only one to be entirely underwhelmed by this strategy. This is not the future of aging research that we should either want or support.

Yes, it is a good thing that a sizable fraction of the research community is now prepared to work towards treating aging as a medical condition, and to advocate for that work in public. It wasn’t always this way, and it took considerable effort to bring about the present renaissance. Yet if the research community aims low, consuming funding and careers to make progress towards goals for human longevity that are only a tiny bit removed from doing nothing at all, what is the point? If we want to instead see meaningful progress towards rejuvenation therapies capable of achieving a far greater impact on aging and the health of older people, we should look to groups like the SENS Research Foundation and its allies in the research community, or the companies developing senolytic therapies to clear senescent cells. The goal should be to repair the causes of aging, aiming to put a stop to aging, to bring it under control, not merely slow it down a little.

Over the past decades, the compression of morbidity was a basic strategy in gerontology. This strategy is aimed at limiting morbidity to a short time period near the end of life, thereby reducing the burden of diseases and disabilities through delay in the age at onset of the most common aging-related pathological conditions. A few years ago, a new direction in geriatric medicine, geroscience, began to develop. This interdisciplinary field of research is aimed at understanding the mechanistic links between aging and aging-associated diseases and centered primarily on extension of healthspan. According to the “geroscience hypothesis”, aging could be manipulated in such a way that will in parallel allow delay the onset of all age-associated chronic disorders, because these pathologies share the same primary underlying risk factor, age.

Healthspan extension is a central component of activities aimed at achievement of ‘optimal longevity’, a condition defined as ‘living long, but with good health and quality of life’ including improved productivity, functioning and independence. Currently, the research attempted to enhance healthspan are focused primarily on slowing the biological processes underlying aging such as dysfunctions of mitochondria, impaired proteostasis and stem cell function and maintenance, deregulated sensing of cell energy status and growth pathways, cellular senescence, age-related decrease in stress resistance, as well as oxidative and inflammatory stress. These processes interact, influencing each other in order to maintain the normal pathways of cellular signaling and to support organismal homeostasis. The compensatory mechanisms mediating these processes, however, became exhausted when reaching a certain age and various aging aspects are manifested, enhancing as a consequence the risk of functional declines and progression of age-associated chronic pathologies.

Aging is traditionally regarded as ‘natural’ and consequently unpreventable process. However, in the opinion of many field experts, the idea that aging is inevitable part of human nature is rather questionable. Indeed, most present-day evolutionary theories postulate that aging has arisen as a by-product of fundamental evolutionary processes and does not have any specific function. If aging is in fact not an inadmissible component of life, then it might be manipulated like other processes that are commonly believed to be pathological or unnatural. The basic supposition underlying anti-aging research is that age-associated senescence may be regarded as a complex of pathophysiological processes that could be prevented, delayed, or even reversed.

The further elaboration of pharmaceuticals (both supplements and clinically approved drugs) specifically targeted at age-related pathologies is one of the most rapidly developing fields in modern biogerontology. An important point is, however, that most substances with potential anti-aging properties are apparently multifunctional and targeted at various molecular pathways that mediate aging. Furthermore, there is only limited evidence to demonstrate overall health benefits of using such substances so far. Findings from epidemiological studies reporting the long-term health impacts of these agents are rather inconsistent.

Another reasonable approach in anti-aging pharmacology is evaluation of the geroprotective potential of medications already approved by regulatory authorities for treating various pathological conditions related to aging. Among them, metformin, statins, beta-blockers, thiazolidinediones, newer generation β-adrenergic receptor inhibitors, renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors, as well as anti-inflammatory medications appear to be the most promising drug candidates in this respect. The safety of these drugs has been confirmed in a number of clinical trials. This is also compelling evidence that they may improve health, well-being and physiological functioning in elderly patients suffering from chronic pathologies. One problem is that these substances are not used currently for treating age-related pathological conditions in the absence of clinical manifestations of particular illness. There are, however, good reasons to suggest that these agents could theoretically be redirected to preventing or treating other syndromes or conditions commonly associated with aging.

Despite an extraordinary rapid technological progress in pharmacology, there are few new preparations in the development pipeline now. Thereby, drugs generated on the basis of new knowledge gained from biogerontological research that can delay or prevent most age-associated disorders would apparently become “blockbusters” of modern pharmaceutical industry and market. That follows the idea that the extension of the healthy life expectancy by slowing aging process is the most efficient way to combat aging-related chronic illnesses and disabling conditions representing serious medical, social and economic issue in modern societies. This idea is referred to as the “longevity dividend” in the contemporary literature. Discovery and development of anti-aging drugs could likely provide an opportunity for revitalization of the drug development pipeline. Indeed, if it would be possible to slow down the aging process per se, then that would allow delay or prevent most aging-related disorders rather than combating them one by one, which is the conventional approach in the present-day disease-based paradigm of drug development.

Seeding Regrowth of Liver Tissue

Tissue engineers heve demonstrate the ability to implant a seed consisting of a scaffold and liver cells into mice, and have it expand considerably into new tissue resembling natural liver tissue. This is an interesting hybrid approach between the two distinct strategies of growing tissue outside the body for transplantation and steering cell behavior to produce regrowth inside the body. Given the wide variety of technical initiatives aimed at organ regrowth, most of which are just as promising, it is hard to say at this point which of them will first break through into widespread use in human medicine.

Engineering human livers is a lofty goal. Human liver cells, hepatocytes, are particularly difficult to grow in the laboratory as they lose liver functions quickly in a dish. Now, researchers show that a “seed” of human hepatocytes and supporting cells assembled and patterned within a scaffold can grow out to 50 times its original size when implanted into mice. These engineered livers, which begin to resemble the natural structure of the organ, offer an approach to study organ development and as a potential strategy for organ engineering. “When we implant these tissues into a mouse with liver injury, the tissue seeds just blossom. Nature takes over and self-assembles a structure that looks like a human liver and has many liver-associated functions.”

In 2011, the researchers showed that human liver-cell aggregates could be grown in mice. They assembled human hepatocytes and supportive stromal cells within a polymer scaffold, demonstrating that this dime-size artificial human liver tissue could grow stably for weeks in immune-compromised mice that had their own normal livers. The liver implant fused with the mouse circulatory system and received blood to perform a few liver functions. In the new work, the lab wanted to expand the size of the human liver graft beyond the 1 million cells used in the prior model. The team assembled different geometries of human primary hepatocytes, human umbilical vein endothelial cells, and fibroblasts, placed them within a degradable hydrogel, and implanted the tissue seed into a fat pad within a liver-injury mouse model.

To recapitulate liver damage, the animals are missing a key amino acid metabolism gene that results in toxic metabolite build up and progressive liver failure, which can be rescued by a drug used to treat individuals with a similar genetic disorder. The group chose this model because it they expected it to foster the liver seeds’ growth. “The hypothesis is that mouse liver injury will produce factors that will travel through the blood stream and tell the human liver tissue to regenerate.” The team found that the human liver tissue grew less in animals that were continuously treated with the drug compared to animals that were given intermittent cycles of the drug.

The human liver seed tissue grew best when they assembled endothelial cells into rope-like structures on top of the hepatocytes, rather than when the tissue was a spherical aggregate of all three cell types. The patterned tissue formed new structures in vivo, including ones that resembled bile ducts, and contained pockets of red blood cells, suggesting the presence of vascular structures within the tissue. The organ-like structures also produced appropriate human proteins such as albumin and transferrin.

Neuroinflammation in Age-Related Retinal Degeneration

Chronic inflammation in nervous system tissue is a common theme in age-related neurodegenerative diseases, including those that affect the retina. One source of this inflammation is the activities of microglia, a class of immune cell resident in the central nervous system. Microglia have a number of important roles to play in nervous system function beyond those of clearing debris and destroying errant cells. As immune function and tissue integrity become disarrayed with age, microglia grow overactive and inflammatory to the point of causing harm rather than helping to resolve issues. Due to the complexity of cellular metabolism, it is at present a challenge to draw a clear line of cause and consequence between the fundamental types of cell and tissue damage that cause aging and late stage consequences such as badly behaving microglia. As therapies to remove or repair portions of this damage emerge, the situation will become less confusing, however. This is a case in which the fastest way forward is to try approaches to the repair of old tissue and see what happens as a result to the system as a whole.

Microglia, the immunocompetent cells of the central nervous system (CNS), act as neuropathology sensors and are neuroprotective under physiological conditions. Microglia react to injury and degeneration with immune-phenotypic and morphological changes, proliferation, migration, and inflammatory cytokine production. An uncontrolled microglial response secondary to sustained CNS damage can put neuronal survival at risk due to excessive inflammation. A neuroinflammatory response is considered among the etiological factors of the major aged-related neurodegenerative diseases of the CNS, and microglial cells are key players in these neurodegenerative lesions.

The retina is an extension of the brain and therefore the inflammatory response in the brain can occur in the retina. The brain and retina are affected in several neurodegenerative diseases, including Alzheimer’s disease (AD), Parkinson’s disease (PD), and glaucoma. AD is an age-related neurodegeneration of the CNS characterized by neuronal and synaptic loss in the cerebral cortex, resulting in cognitive deficit and dementia. The extracellular deposits of beta-amyloid (Aβ) and intraneuronal accumulations of hyperphosphorylated tau protein (pTau) are the hallmarks of this disease. These deposits are also found in the retina and optic nerve. PD is a neurodegenerative locomotor disorder with the progressive loss of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra. This is accompanied by Lewy body inclusion composed of α-synuclein (α-syn) aggregates. PD also involves retinal dopaminergic cell degeneration. Glaucoma is a multifactorial neurodegenerative disease of the optic nerve, characterized by retinal ganglion cell loss. In this pathology, deposition of Aβ, synuclein, and pTau has also been detected in retina.

These neurodegenerative diseases share a common pathogenic mechanism, neuroinflammation, in which microglia play an important role. Microglial activation has been reported in AD, PD, and glaucoma in relation to protein aggregates and degenerated neurons. The activated microglia can release pro-inflammatory cytokines which can aggravate and propagate neuroinflammation, thereby degenerating neurons and impairing brain as well as retinal function. The differential activation of microglial M1 or M2 phenotypes can produce a neurotoxic or neuroprotective environment, and could constitute a key in neuroinflammation regulation. In the search for a new strategy to control neuroinflammation, it might be more effective to change the M1 phenotype to the M2 phenotype than to block microglial activation completely. In the regulation of microglial activation, several cell types including, neurons, astrocytes, and T-cells are involved. When the neuroinflammatory process is triggered by protein aggregates (Aß, α-syn, pTau etc.), peripheral immune cells infiltrate CNS and prompt more activation on resident microglia, favoring neuroinflammatory processes.

Regeneration of Retinal Cells in Adult Mice

Researchers have discovered a way to provoke generation of new retinal cells in mice, based on investigation of the way in which regeneration functions in zebrafish, a species capable of regrowing lost organs. If we are fortunate, there will be something here that can be generalized and applied to other nervous system tissues, but even if restricted to the retina this is a good step forward for the field. It is promising to see that research into the biochemistry of species capable of proficient regeneration, such as zebrafish and salamanders, is starting to bear fruit.

Many tissues of our bodies, such as our skin, can heal because they contain stem cells that can divide and differentiate into the type of cells needed to repair damaged tissue. The cells of our retinas, however, lack this ability to regenerate. As a consequence, injury to the retina often leads to permanent vision loss. This is not the case, however, in zebrafish, which have a remarkable ability to regenerate damaged tissue, including neural tissue like the retina. This is possible because the zebrafish retina contains cells called Müller glia that harbor a gene that allows them to regenerate. When these cells sense that the retina has been injured, they turn on this gene, called Ascl1. The gene codes for a type of protein called a transcription factor. It can affect the activity of many other genes and, therefore, have a major effect on cell function. In the case of the zebrafish, activation of Ascl1 essentially reprograms the glia into stem cells that can change to become all the cell types needed to repair the retina and restore sight.

Researchers wanted see whether it was possible to use this gene to reprogram Müller glia in adult mice. The researchers hoped to prompt a regeneration that doesn’t happen naturally in mammal’s retina. Like humans, mice cannot repair their retinas. They created a mouse that had a version of the Ascl1 gene in its Müller glia that was turned on with an injection of the drug tamoxifen. Earlier studies by the team had shown that when they activated the gene, the Müller glia would differentiate into retinal cells known as interneurons after an injury to the retina of these mice. These cells play a vital role in sight. They receive and process signals from the retina’s light-detecting cells, the rods and the cones, and transmit them to another set of cells that, in turn, transfer the information to the brain.

In their earlier research, however, the researchers found that activating the gene worked only during the first two weeks after birth. Any later, and the mice could no longer repair their retinas. The researchers determined that genes critical to the Müller glia regeneration were being blocked by molecules that bind to chromosomes. This is one way cells “lock up” genes to keep them from being activated. It is a form of epigenetic regulation – the control of how and when parts of the genome operate. In their new paper, the researchers show that by using a drug that blocks epigenetic regulation called a histone deacetylase inhibitor, activation of Ascl1 allows the Müller glia in adult mice to differentiate into functioning interneurons. The researchers demonstrated that these new interneurons integrate into the existing retina, establish connections with other retinal cells, and react normally to signals from the light-detecting retinal cells.

More Theorizing on the Role of Pathogens in Alzheimer’s Disease

The dominant approach to Alzheimer’s research and the development of potential therapies involves finding ways to clear out aggregates of amyloid and tau that build up in the brain. This has proven challenging, however. It is too early to say in certainty whether lack of tangible progress on this front is because it is a hard problem, or because this isn’t the most effective direction. The weight of evidence strongly suggests the former is the case, but that hasn’t stopped delayed progress from spurring the development of a great many alternative hypotheses as to the cause of Alzheimer’s disease. One line of thinking suggests that pathogens are more important than presently accepted to be the case, and paints Alzheimer’s disease as a consequence of the progressive age-related failure of the immune system to deal with specific types of invading microbe. The paper here is one example of the type.

The infectious nature of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) was revealed when spirochetes (both dental and Lyme) were shown to be present in the brains of affected patients. The dental microbes travel from the oral cavity during times of disruption of the dental plaque and subsequent bacteremia following dental procedures. Lyme borrelia travel to the brain via the blood stream during the secondary stage of that disease. The spirochetes have an affinity for neural tissue and pass through the blood-brain barrier easily. Once the spirochetes are in the brain, they attach, divide (albeit very, very slowly), and multiply. When they reach a quorum, they begin to spin out a biofilm. Because of the exceedingly slow division, it takes approximately 2 years to accumulate sufficient organisms to make one biofilm. At some point after attachment and formation of the biofilms, the innate immune system becomes activated and attempts to destroy them.

The innate immune system first responder, Toll-like receptor 2, generates both NF-κB and TNF-α which try to kill the spirochetes in the biofilm, but cannot penetrate the “slime”. NF-κB is also responsible for the generation of amyloid-β (Aβ) which itself is anti-microbial. Aβ cannot penetrate the biofilm either, and its accumulation leads to destruction of the cerebral neurocircuitry. Where spirochetes have been found in the brains of Alzheimer’s disease (AD), it may be considered an infectious disease. Treatment with a bactericidal antibiotic with a concomitant biofilm disperser seems most reasonable; but any neurologic damage is irreversible. It is therefore of the utmost importance to treat early in the course of this disease.

Changes in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Activity with Aging

Hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) reside it the bone marrow and produce all of the different types of blood and immune cell, via a cascade of various types of progenitor cell. Stem cell behavior changes in a number of ways with aging, most notably in a general reduction of activity that leads to inadequate tissue maintenance, but also in other possibly damaging ways. For example, HSCs tend to bias their production of progenitors more towards myeloid cell types and less towards lympoid cell types, which is thought to contribute to the growing disarray of the immune system. In this open access paper, researchers examine an aspect of this phenomenon.

Age-related phenotypes within the hematopoietic system can be influenced by cell-extrinsic alterations, such as changes in the bone marrow (BM) microenvironment. However, in mice, ample evidence points to intrinsic alterations in the hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) themselves as the main drivers of hematological aging. These include functional, genetic, and epigenetic modifications. In mice, HSCs increase in frequency that however is paralleled by a decreased proliferative capacity on a per-cell basis. In several reports, aged murine HSCs have been characterized by an increased myeloid-to-lymphoid output, often referred to as a myeloid bias (My-bi), although also their myeloid cell forming ability is decreased on a per cell basis when compared to younger HSCs.

These observations are presumably coupled to an age-related clonal shift within the aged HSC compartment towards increased My-bi HSC frequency at the expense of lymphoid-biased (Ly-bi) HSCs. Regardless, the lineage skewing with murine HSC aging has been linked to an upregulation of myeloid-specific genes and a downregulation of lymphoid-specific genes, although many of previous transcriptome analyses were based on a selection and manual curation of lineage-associated genes. By contrast, recent global transcriptome analysis of single HSCs based on more objectively defined lineage-affiliated transcription programs revealed a molecular and functional platelet bias, rather than a My-bi, in aged murine HSC.

Human HSC and progenitor cell aging has not been characterized as extensively as within the murine system, but several parallels suggest that aging characteristics at least to some degree might be conserved across species. For instance, HSC proliferation and clonal diversity decline between cord blood (CB) and aged bone marrow (BM). In addition, donor age affects outcome of clinical BM transplantations, although this most likely cannot be solely attributed to reduced HSC performance. More direct evaluations of the frequencies and function of aged human hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs) from a limited number of individuals displayed similarities to previous findings in the mouse, including an increased myeloid-to-lymphoid output ratio and decreased reconstitution potential, although this is not undisputed. In the present study we characterize age-related changes of human HPSCs and compare these to similar studies in mice. By separating the myeloid lineage into megakaryocytic/erythroid and granulocyte/macrophage lineage, we could reveal a molecular underpinning of megakaryocytic/erythroid bias in aged HSC of both humans and mice.

Downstream of human HSCs, we observed decreasing levels of common lymphoid progenitors (CLPs), and increasing frequencies of megakaryocyte/erythrocyte progenitors (MEPs) with age, which could be linked to changes in lineage-affiliated gene expression patterns in aged human HSCs. These findings were paralleled in mice. Therefore, our data support the notion that age-related changes also in human hematopoiesis involve the HSC pool, with a prominent skewing towards the megakaryocytic/erythroid lineages, and suggests conserved mechanisms underlying aging of the blood cell system.

Our results support the notion that an increased HSC frequency with age may be a compensatory mechanism to sustain sufficient blood cell replenishment. However, these compensatory mechanisms do not fully maintain optimal functions of HSCs and progenitor cells in elderly humans, as evidenced by the frequency of age-related hematological defects, including anemia and reduced immune responses. A deeper understanding of the events underlying this functional decline may support interventional approaches to prevent or ameliorate the aging hematopoietic phenotype.

An Introduction to Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Regenerative Research

This open access paper provides an introduction to the widespread use of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) in regenerative medicine and research. This is one of the better documented stem cell populations. The scientific and medical communities have more experience with these cells than is the case for most other stem cell types, the methodologies for use are more established, and as a consequence MSCs have been and continue to be used in many clinical trials, cell therapies available via medical tourism, and lines of ongoing research. That said, these cells are training wheels in a way, one present step on a longer road. The step is taken because it is convenient and should reliably lead to the next stage in the development of better cell therapies – not because it is the final stopping point.

Being first isolated in 1966 from bone marrow, mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) are adult stromal nonhematopoietic cells, well known for their potential to differentiate into osteoblasts and osteocytes. Although they are most known for their osteogenic differentiation potential, MSC have the ability to commit into all three lineages (osteogenic, chondrogenic, and adipogenic). MSC have been isolated and purified not only from bone marrow where they cooperate with hematopoietic stem cells (HSC) to form the niche, but also from various tissues, such as umbilical cord and umbilical cord blood, white adipose tissue, placenta, and the amniotic membrane of placenta. The capacity of MSC to differentiate into cell lineages and develop teratoma, a preserved tumor that contains normal three-germ layer tissue and organ parts, is a reason to consider them as multipotent progenitor cells suitable for regenerative therapy.

Beside their potential to differentiate into osteoblasts in the process of osteogenesis, there have been several other regenerative roles attributed to MSC. These cells can serve as pericytes wrapping around blood vessels to support their structure and stability. MSC have also shown the potential to integrate into the outer wall of the microvessels and arteries in many organs, such as spleen, liver, kidney, lung, pancreas, and brain. This led to the speculation that both bone marrow- and vascular wall-derived MSC as well as white adipose tissue-, umbilical cord blood-, and amniotic membrane-derived MSC could act as a cell source for regenerative therapy to treat various disorders such as osteoporosis, arthritis, and vessel regeneration after injury.

MSC may also be induced to differentiate into functional neurons, corneal epithelial cells, and cardiomyocytes under specific pretreatments ex vivo and in vivo that broaden the capacity of these cells in regenerative therapeutic interventions. In a previous study, umbilical cord matrix stem cells derived from human umbilical cord Wharton’s Jelly were aimed to treat neurodegenerative disorders such as Parkinson’s disease by transplantation into the brain of a rat model. The transplantation resulted in a significant reduction of symptoms for Parkinson’s disease, thus suggesting an additional therapeutic role for umbilical cord matrix stem cells (MSC) in treating central nervous disorders. Further, MSCs exibit potent immunomodulatory and anti-inflammatory properties through cellular crosstalk and production of bioactive molecules.

These findings were enough evidence for scientists to speculate a promising role for MSC in regenerative therapy. In the past years, MSC have been used in clinical trials aiming for regeneration of tissues such as bone and cartilage as well as treatment of disorders such as spinal cord injury, multiple sclerosis (MS), Crohn’s disease, and graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) due to their broad differentiation capacity and potential of hematopoietic cell recruitment. Several clinical trials are running to identify different aspects of MSC application in terms of safety and efficacy, and at the time of writing, a total number of 657 past clinical studies were found that involve mesenchymal stem cells for different clinical phases.



Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s